Mobility Matters
Home›Mobile agents on graphs›Computing with agents›Maximal independent set by agents

Maximal independent set by agents

\(n\) agents in an anonymous graph must mark a maximal independent set of nodes.

Problem statement and measuresexpand

\(n\) agents with distinct identifiers (IDs) are placed on the nodes of an anonymous port-labelled graph with \(n\) nodes, \(m\) edges and maximum degree \(\Delta\). The start is rooted (all agents on one node), dispersed (one agent on each node) or arbitrary. Agents compute only by moving and by talking with agents on the same node. The agents must settle on the nodes of a maximal independent set, every other agent knowing it is not in the set: every agent (or node) learns its part of the output. Time is in synchronous rounds; memory in bits per agent.

Measures: Time, rounds; Memory, bits per agent.

Rooted start, no knowledge

verified
Time: unknownMemory: unknown

From a rooted start without knowledge of \(n\) or \(\Delta\), an MIS takes \(O(n\Delta)\) rounds with \(O(\log n)\) bits.

Assumed (added on the last edge are outlined)

+Graph dynamicsstatic graph+Edge directionundirected+Identifiersdistinct identifiers (eponymous): agents have pairwise distinct identifiers+Communicationlocal (co-located agents communicate)+Timingsynchronous rounds+Initial configurationrooted (all agents on one node)

Not assumed

Knowledgeno knowledge of graph parametersTopologyarbitrary connected graph
Formal definitions of this setting
Graph dynamics: static graph
\(G_t=G\) for all \(t\): the edge set never changes.
Edge direction: undirected
\(G=(V,E)\) with \(E\subseteq\binom V2\); every edge can be traversed in both directions.
Identifiers: distinct IDs (eponymous)
Distinct identifiers (eponymous agents): the label function \(\mathrm{id}:\{1,\dots,k\}\to\{1,\dots,L\}\) is injective; usually \(L=k^{O(1)}\), so a label takes \(O(\log k)\) bits.
Communication: local communication
Agents at the same node at the same time can read each other's entire memory (face-to-face communication). Agents crossing on an edge do not meet.
Timing: synchronous
Time proceeds in rounds \(t=1,2,\dots\); in every round every agent communicates, computes and moves (at most one edge) simultaneously.
Knowledge: no knowledge
Agents know no graph parameter (\(n\), \(m\), \(\Delta\), \(D\)).
Initial configuration: rooted start
All \(k\) agents start at the same node (\(\ell=1\)). Also called co-located (black hole search: all agents at the home base) or a rooted graph Molla & Moses Jr. 2019.
Topology: any topology
\(G\) is any connected graph in the class allowed by the other axes.

What is known

Time · rounds
unknown
No lower bound. From an arbitrary start, \(O(\max\{n\log^2 n, m\})\) rounds with \(O(\log n)\) bits Kaur et al. 2026c carry over and are faster when \(m = o(n\Delta)\) and \(\Delta\) exceeds \(\log^2 n\).
lower boundnone known
introductory—
current best
\(O(n\Delta)\)
Memory · bits per agent
unknown
Pattanayak et al. 2024 call \(O(\log n)\) bits optimal because an agent stores its ID; no lower bound is recorded here.
lower boundnone known
introductory—
current best
\(O(\log n)\)

Results, in order of publication

Time \(O(n\Delta)\)Memory \(O(\log n)\)

Introductory and current best (Theorem 3.1, Algorithm MIS-GraphRooted): a depth-first traversal that settles one agent on each new node, while the unsettled agents visit the neighbours of that node to learn whether one of them is already in the set; at most \(4m\) rounds of traversal and \(2\delta\) rounds of visits at a node of degree \(\delta\). No knowledge of graph parameters. On trees, \(O(D^2)\) rounds with \(O(\log n)\) bits (Theorem 4.2).

Open questions

None recorded for this variant.

Notes

The rooted start is all \(n\) agents on one node (initial axis of the model). From the same start, Kshemkalyani et al. 2024 need \(O(n\Delta)\) rounds and \(O(n\log n)\) bits (Theorem 20), which this result dominates. Checked against the full text of Pattanayak et al. 2024.

What carries over from neighbouring settings

Read off the order of assumptions, not checked case by case: results may carry extra assumptions (shown on their pages), and asynchronous time is measured in epochs.

Algorithms from weaker settings work here

No knowledge
Time \(O(\max\{n\log^2 n,m\})\)Memory \(O(\log n)\)

Lower bounds from stronger settings hold here

No catalogued stronger setting.

Know a better result for this setting, or found a mistake? Suggest a result · Report an error. Accepted contributions are acknowledged.